Message 274189 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	steve.newcomb
Recipients	rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steve.newcomb, vstinner
Date	2016-09-02.00:35:57
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<699f668b-c646-9fa1-620e-8596f413f23c@coolheads.com>
In-reply-to	<ade62137-4116-ac3c-a695-e3a3ea79aec4@coolheads.com>

Content
On 09/01/2016 05:01 PM, Steve Newcomb wrote: > >> The outputs show that 2.7.12's re.sub() takes 1.2 times as long as >> 2.7.6's. It's a significant difference, but... >> >> ...it was not the dramatic degradation I expected to find in this >> exercise. On second (third?) thought, the degree of degradation could easily depend on the source data being processed. Maybe test.py does, in fact, demonstrate the problem, but the test data I used (p17-118.htm) do not demonstrate a terribly severe case of the problem.

On 09/01/2016 05:01 PM, Steve Newcomb wrote:
>
>> The outputs show that 2.7.12's re.sub() takes 1.2 times as long as 
>> 2.7.6's.  It's a significant difference, but...
>>
>> ...it was not the dramatic degradation I expected to find in this 
>> exercise.
On second (third?) thought, the degree of degradation could easily 
depend on the source data being processed.  Maybe test.py does, in fact, 
demonstrate the problem, but the test data I used (p17-118.htm) do not 
demonstrate a terribly severe case of the problem.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-09-02 00:35:58	steve.newcomb	set	recipients: + steve.newcomb, rhettinger, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka
2016-09-02 00:35:58	steve.newcomb	link	issue27898 messages
2016-09-02 00:35:57	steve.newcomb	create