Message274059
Thanks for the explanation, understood. However, I don't think it would be terribly difficult to demonstrate that these changes do address actual pains(*) in the situations they're supposed to address them. And the pains in question might in real world occur quite rarely, unexpectedly, and take some time/cost to debug and reproduce, which is why it would be good to be able to preemptively address them.
(*) For some values of "pain" -- many of the changes here are just for outputting nice-to-know timing information. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-08-31 18:52:11 | scop | set | recipients:
+ scop, gvanrossum, rhettinger, davin |
2016-08-31 18:52:11 | scop | set | messageid: <1472669531.1.0.806480606206.issue27916@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-08-31 18:52:11 | scop | link | issue27916 messages |
2016-08-31 18:52:11 | scop | create | |
|