Author masamoto
Recipients dellair.jie, erik.bray, loewis, masamoto, r.david.murray, rpetrov, vstinner
Date 2016-08-23.16:49:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1471970975.35.0.083940888748.issue21085@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Hello, I'm writer for past patch.
3.4-issue21085-struct_siginfo.patch removes si_band field from struct_siginfo if the C siginfo_t doesn't have si_band field.
This modification raises a incompatibility between platforms having struct_siginfo.
Now, I wrote another patch that doesn't change fields of struct_siginfo to avoid its incompatibility. 
And I built cpython 3.5.2+ on vista cygwin-x86 using this patch.
Murray, would you be able to tell me your idea?
Many thanks.

New patch changes:
If platform has the C siginfo_t structure, but it doesn't have si_band field, the struct_siginfo.si_band field is always assigned zero at function return value.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-08-23 16:49:35masamotosetrecipients: + masamoto, loewis, vstinner, rpetrov, r.david.murray, erik.bray, dellair.jie
2016-08-23 16:49:35masamotosetmessageid: <1471970975.35.0.083940888748.issue21085@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-08-23 16:49:35masamotolinkissue21085 messages
2016-08-23 16:49:35masamotocreate