Message 272435 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	martin.panter
Recipients	Lukasa, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, icordasc, jhylton, loewis, martin.panter, orsenthil, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach
Date	2016-08-11.10:31:37
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1470911497.79.0.234334291451.issue10721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
There are a few small benefits from removing it, but I am not too fussed if we decide to leave it. * If we keep it, should we fix it so that it doesn’t deadlock? Otherwise, we carry around buggy and untested code that claims to be a HTTP 0.9 server but isn’t. Keeping it as it is doesn’t feel “clean” to me. * Easy way to resolve bug reports like Issue 26578. * Potentially slightly easier to maintain the rest of the code in the future. If we do keep it, I would like to add comments clarifying that it does not implement the real HTTP 0.9 protocol.

There are a few small benefits from removing it, but I am not too fussed if we decide to leave it.

* If we keep it, should we fix it so that it doesn’t deadlock? Otherwise, we carry around buggy and untested code that claims to be a HTTP 0.9 server but isn’t. Keeping it as it is doesn’t feel “clean” to me.

* Easy way to resolve bug reports like Issue 26578.

* Potentially slightly easier to maintain the rest of the code in the future.

If we do keep it, I would like to add comments clarifying that it does not implement the real HTTP 0.9 protocol.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-08-11 10:31:37	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, loewis, jhylton, rhettinger, orsenthil, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, stutzbach, eric.araujo, icordasc, Lukasa
2016-08-11 10:31:37	martin.panter	set	messageid: <1470911497.79.0.234334291451.issue10721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-08-11 10:31:37	martin.panter	link	issue10721 messages
2016-08-11 10:31:37	martin.panter	create