Author socketpair
Recipients abarry, berker.peksag, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, socketpair
Date 2016-08-02.18:29:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
1. I forgot to say: since I add new items to `if.. elif...elif.....` chain after testing for 'big' and 'little', this change will not slowdown current external code.
2. Well, slowdown of to_bytes() between 'big' and 'net' on my PC give about 3 percents.
3. to_bytes(2, sys.byteorder) is timed exactly as 'host'.

./python -m timeit -s 'import sys' -n 10000000 '(1234).to_bytes(2, sys.byteorder)' # iteration counter is required to stabilize results.

4. As I think, Python should also be simple and intuitive. If everyone thinks as those, who set (-1) on this issue, we will neve add .to_bytes()/.from_bytes(), since there are already TWO (!) modules to do conversion to/from bytes: `ctypes` ( and `struct`. Answer is: it is unsuitable and not comfort for the programmer. Why not to make really good practical API ?

And also, I want to call @gvanrossum.. I'm disappointed. This change is so obvious thing, that I don't understand how to explain...
Date User Action Args
2016-08-02 18:29:27socketpairsetrecipients: + socketpair, mark.dickinson, skrah, berker.peksag, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, abarry
2016-08-02 18:29:27socketpairsetmessageid: <>
2016-08-02 18:29:27socketpairlinkissue27638 messages
2016-08-02 18:29:27socketpaircreate