➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients abarry, docs@python, magniff, mark.dickinson, r.david.murray
Date 2016-07-23.20:20:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1469305213.93.0.423865390736.issue27601@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Adding a _ after a keyword is a very common trick.  The fact that one got lost indicates that it isn't necessarily optimal :).  I don't really have an opinion one way or the other on the variable rename.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-07-23 20:20:13r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, mark.dickinson, docs@python, abarry, magniff
2016-07-23 20:20:13r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1469305213.93.0.423865390736.issue27601@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-07-23 20:20:13r.david.murraylinkissue27601 messages
2016-07-23 20:20:13r.david.murraycreate