Author r.david.murray
Recipients davin, eryksun, neologix, pietvo, pitrou, r.david.murray, sbt, tim.peters
Date 2016-07-14.16:36:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1468514203.27.0.796481581409.issue18966@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
As far as muliprocessing's "mentality" goes, it aims to provide the *same* API as Threading, so it is logical that it should preserve threading's behavior with respect to child threads in a process, rather than violating threading's model.  Anything else is counter-intuitive to a python programmer, as demonstrated by this issue and Tim's comments :)
History
Date User Action Args
2016-07-14 16:36:43r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, tim.peters, pitrou, pietvo, neologix, sbt, eryksun, davin
2016-07-14 16:36:43r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1468514203.27.0.796481581409.issue18966@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-07-14 16:36:43r.david.murraylinkissue18966 messages
2016-07-14 16:36:43r.david.murraycreate