Author vstinner
Recipients ebarry, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, martin.panter, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, ztane
Date 2016-06-27.08:20:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1467015644.06.0.282541787553.issue27364@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Guido: "I am okay with making it a silent warning."

The current patch raises a DeprecationWarning which is silent by default, but seen using python3 -Wd. What is the "long term" plan: always raise an *exception* in Python 3.7? Which exception?

Another option is to always emit a SyntaxWarning, but don't raise an exception in long term. It is possible to get an exception using python3 -Werror.

There is also FutureWarning: "Base class for warnings about constructs that will change semantically in the future" or RuntimeWarning "Base class for warnings about dubious runtime behavior".
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-27 08:20:44vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, ztane, ebarry
2016-06-27 08:20:44vstinnersetmessageid: <1467015644.06.0.282541787553.issue27364@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-27 08:20:44vstinnerlinkissue27364 messages
2016-06-27 08:20:43vstinnercreate