This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients mark.dickinson, veky
Date 2016-06-21.19:27:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1466537257.85.0.0618133456754.issue27363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
This has been discussed in multiple issues before this one. Currently, `complex` from a string provides one of two ways to get a complex number with the correct signs for the real and imaginary parts; I'd hate to change that to give wrong results instead.

The other important property here is that `complex(repr(z))` recovers `z` for a complex number `z`. That would break with your suggested change.

Strong -1 from me.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-21 19:27:37mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, veky
2016-06-21 19:27:37mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1466537257.85.0.0618133456754.issue27363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-21 19:27:37mark.dickinsonlinkissue27363 messages
2016-06-21 19:27:37mark.dickinsoncreate