Message269014
This has been discussed in multiple issues before this one. Currently, `complex` from a string provides one of two ways to get a complex number with the correct signs for the real and imaginary parts; I'd hate to change that to give wrong results instead.
The other important property here is that `complex(repr(z))` recovers `z` for a complex number `z`. That would break with your suggested change.
Strong -1 from me. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-21 19:27:37 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, veky |
2016-06-21 19:27:37 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1466537257.85.0.0618133456754.issue27363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-21 19:27:37 | mark.dickinson | link | issue27363 messages |
2016-06-21 19:27:37 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|