➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author larry
Recipients Colm Buckley, Lukasa, Theodore Tso, alex, doko, dstufft, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitti, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane
Date 2016-06-09.00:07:00
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1465430820.9.0.725286875966.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Regardless of the behavior of os.urandom (and 'import random'), is it agreed that the current state of _PyRandom_Init is acceptable for 3.5.2?

I'll get back to you with a specific yes or no.  What I want is that it the behavior removed where "import random" can block unboundedly on Linux because it's waiting for the entropy pool to fill.  If the code behaves like that, then yes, but I'm not giving it my official blessing until I read it.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-09 00:07:01larrysetrecipients: + larry, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, ncoghlan, vstinner, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, dstufft, pitti, Lukasa, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley, Theodore Tso
2016-06-09 00:07:00larrysetmessageid: <1465430820.9.0.725286875966.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-09 00:07:00larrylinkissue26839 messages
2016-06-09 00:07:00larrycreate