This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients Colm Buckley, alex, doko, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane
Date 2016-06-07.11:34:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1465299275.2.0.0393500228347.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Stefan Krah: "I think this is a very good idea. Just a flag for "cryptographically secure" or not."

If you consider it is worth it, please open a new issue.

I dislike the idea of a boolean. The quality of each system RNG has been discussed long enough to be able to say that "cryptographically secure" term depends a lot of your use case, and experts disagree between themself :-) You might even have to consider the version of the Linux kernel to decide if /dev/urandom is good enough or not for you use case. The implementation changed last years.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-07 11:34:35vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley
2016-06-07 11:34:35vstinnersetmessageid: <1465299275.2.0.0393500228347.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-07 11:34:35vstinnerlinkissue26839 messages
2016-06-07 11:34:34vstinnercreate