Author gvanrossum
Recipients brett.cannon, gvanrossum, larry, lukasz.langa, ncoghlan, ned.deily, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2016-06-06.20:31:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
Would it be easier to handle for everyone if this did not vary between
3.5.0/1 and 3.5.2, and instead was an incompatibility in 3.6? (That would
still be allowed given 492's provisional status.)
Date User Action Args
2016-06-06 20:31:34gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, larry, ned.deily, lukasz.langa, yselivanov
2016-06-06 20:31:34gvanrossumlinkissue27243 messages
2016-06-06 20:31:34gvanrossumcreate