Message267358
Thanks again for valuable comments.
I agree that there could be a case where send_error() gets used for both HEAD and GET, in which case we could send content-length field as an optional field. However, if send_error() is not used for both HEAD and GET, then the body will likely be different and RFC specifies that we must not send content-length field with different values so I have a slight preference towards not sending it for HEAD request.
If you are OK with leaving content-length out for HEAD, I'd like to proceed with creating a small patch to reflect your comments in code review and also start creating a patches for 2.7 and 3.5. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-05 01:04:16 | Susumu Koshiba | set | recipients:
+ Susumu Koshiba, r.david.murray, martin.panter, deronnax, spaceone |
2016-06-05 01:04:16 | Susumu Koshiba | set | messageid: <1465088656.32.0.790765184146.issue25738@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-05 01:04:16 | Susumu Koshiba | link | issue25738 messages |
2016-06-05 01:04:15 | Susumu Koshiba | create | |
|