Message266673
+1. I prefer that change, as using subclasses of `type` as if they were type itself never made sense to me. This shouldn't break existing code, but if it does, it was either a concealed bug or a very bad idea to begin with, and should be fixed either way.
Attached patch implements Eryk's suggestion. I haven't found any tests that checked for subclasses of type specifically (except tests testing for metaclass stuff), and I haven't added any either. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-05-30 03:57:45 | abarry | set | recipients:
+ abarry, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, eryksun, ppperry |
2016-05-30 03:57:45 | abarry | set | messageid: <1464580665.19.0.121351620328.issue27157@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-05-30 03:57:45 | abarry | link | issue27157 messages |
2016-05-30 03:57:44 | abarry | create | |
|