Message266617
Currently it'll work since in an except it'll generate a CONTINUE_LOOP that'll jump to the end of the loop & either jump back to the start or to the end
Your example is incorrect. If the continue's JUMP_ABS were a FOR_ITER then if we were on the last iteration of the loop we would end up executing the loop body with an invalid stack. So you'd have to follow the FOR_ITER with a JUMP_ABS past the loop. Not sure if there's a speed advantage worth complexity/larger wordcode |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-05-29 19:31:37 | Demur Rumed | set | recipients:
+ Demur Rumed, dino.viehland, serhiy.storchaka |
2016-05-29 19:31:37 | Demur Rumed | set | messageid: <1464550297.83.0.671906196351.issue27127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-05-29 19:31:37 | Demur Rumed | link | issue27127 messages |
2016-05-29 19:31:37 | Demur Rumed | create | |
|