Author markgrandi
Recipients eryksun, hakril, markgrandi, paul.moore, python-dev, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2016-05-25.18:12:51
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1464199971.42.0.0979145218142.issue23026@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
in 'test_winreg.py', there should probably be a test that covers REG_QWORD_LITTLE_ENDIAN, even if they are essentially equivalent 

Also, in Py2Reg and Reg2Py, it seems that both are missing the 'case' clause for REG_QWORD_LITTLE_ENDIAN as well

case REG_QWORD:
case REG_QWORD_LITTLE_ENDIAN:
<code here>

And sure, i would have the documentation changes listed in 'Doc/whatsnew/3.6.rst'. And now that I think about it, the documentation in '/Doc/library/winreg.rst' should probably mention that REG_QWORD and REG_QWORD_LITTLE_ENDIAN are new as of python 3.6
History
Date User Action Args
2016-05-25 18:12:51markgrandisetrecipients: + markgrandi, paul.moore, tim.golden, python-dev, zach.ware, eryksun, steve.dower, hakril
2016-05-25 18:12:51markgrandisetmessageid: <1464199971.42.0.0979145218142.issue23026@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-05-25 18:12:51markgrandilinkissue23026 messages
2016-05-25 18:12:51markgrandicreate