➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients Fedele Mantuano, adepasquale, barry, maciej.szulik, r.david.murray
Date 2016-05-25.17:52:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1464198772.37.0.57656187231.issue27010@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Yes.  The current behavior is not a bug, the question is, do we want to deal with that XXX comment in the test by detecting the duplicate and reconizing the "extra" mime part?  The defect detection would remain.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-05-25 17:52:52r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, barry, maciej.szulik, Fedele Mantuano, adepasquale
2016-05-25 17:52:52r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1464198772.37.0.57656187231.issue27010@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-05-25 17:52:52r.david.murraylinkissue27010 messages
2016-05-25 17:52:52r.david.murraycreate