➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients Arfrever, Mark.Williams, barry, benjamin.peterson, mahmoud, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, stutzbach, xiang.zhang
Date 2016-04-23.07:08:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1461395336.17.0.543809205004.issue25341@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> But this behaviour treating wb+ and rb+ as the same is well tested and
seems to intended to do so.

I think this is not intended behavior. Tests just test that the current behavior is not changed accidentally. If I'm right, the patch LGTM. But since third-party code can depend on this behavior, I would fix it only in 3.6.

Tests were added in issue4362 and Barry asked the same question about "w+" (msg76134).

Barry, Benjamin, what are you think about this now?
History
Date User Action Args
2016-04-23 07:08:56serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, barry, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, stutzbach, Arfrever, mahmoud, Mark.Williams, xiang.zhang
2016-04-23 07:08:56serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1461395336.17.0.543809205004.issue25341@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-04-23 07:08:56serhiy.storchakalinkissue25341 messages
2016-04-23 07:08:56serhiy.storchakacreate