This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients Jonathan Kamens, Paolo Veglia, jmadden, marcjofre, martin.panter, pje
Date 2016-04-09.12:22:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1460204536.86.0.92249514471.issue24291@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
wfile-partial.patch tries to avoid partial writes in every relevant wfile.write() call I could find. Usually I do this by building a BufferedWriter around wfile.

I propose to apply my patch to 3.5 (if people think it is reasonable). For 3.6 I opened Issue 26721 to change the class used for wfile instead.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-04-09 12:22:18martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, pje, jmadden, Jonathan Kamens, marcjofre, Paolo Veglia
2016-04-09 12:22:16martin.pantersetmessageid: <1460204536.86.0.92249514471.issue24291@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-04-09 12:22:16martin.panterlinkissue24291 messages
2016-04-09 12:22:16martin.pantercreate