➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients alex, christian.heimes, dstufft, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, martin.panter, palaviv, pitrou, progval
Date 2016-03-25.00:04:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1458864253.61.0.238957542318.issue25951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Agreed that the documentation and implementation should match. But this seems like a rather low-priority bug. What use case relies on the return value being None?

If there is no immediate need for this change, it might be safer to just make it in 3.6, to minimize compatibility problems. But if it is fixed in 3.5 it should also be fixed in 2.7.

I left some suggestions to simplify the code.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-03-25 00:04:13martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, janssen, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, alex, progval, dstufft, palaviv
2016-03-25 00:04:13martin.pantersetmessageid: <1458864253.61.0.238957542318.issue25951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-03-25 00:04:13martin.panterlinkissue25951 messages
2016-03-25 00:04:13martin.pantercreate