Message261470
All the highlighted issue are now fixed. The limit on n in read1 wasn't tested.
Your suggestion regarding testing went a bit over my head, Martin. So, just trying to make sure we're on the same page. ExtendedReadTest, where I thought placing these new tests, is already employing FakeSocket, but I'm not sure how one would add a second response and to what. In any case, some of the code in that class seems rather specific, so it's not clear if it could or should be reused. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-03-09 19:58:22 | SilentGhost | set | recipients:
+ SilentGhost, kristjan.jonsson, maubp, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
2016-03-09 19:58:22 | SilentGhost | set | messageid: <1457553502.57.0.62651423673.issue26499@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-03-09 19:58:22 | SilentGhost | link | issue26499 messages |
2016-03-09 19:58:22 | SilentGhost | create | |
|