Message257787
Personally I am skeptical if suggesting UTF-8 for the body data is a good idea, but I can go along with it, since other people want it. But I do strongly question whether it is right to suggest UTF-8 for header fields. The RFC <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#page-26> only mentions ASCII and Latin-1.
Newer protocols based on HTTP (RTSP comes to mind) do specify UTF-8 for the header, but that is probably out of scope of both the HTTP module and beginner-targetted errors.
If I were redoing this patch, I would drop all the changes except at the body.encode() line in Emil’s original post. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-01-09 00:02:27 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, gvanrossum, vstinner, ezio.melotti, Emil Stenström |
2016-01-09 00:02:27 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1452297747.11.0.0403234805295.issue26045@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-01-09 00:02:27 | martin.panter | link | issue26045 messages |
2016-01-09 00:02:26 | martin.panter | create | |
|