Message256567
> OK, but only for await (not for yield from).
Sure, generators will stay untouched (I'll even add a unittest for that, if we don't have it).
> It should always be valid to create a new coroutine instance. Perhaps you meant:
Correct, Martin, great that you've noticed that!
I'll duplicate the fixed code:
async def coroutine():
return 123
coro = coroutine()
# In Python 3.5.1:
print(await coro) # will print 123
print(await coro) # prints None
print(await coro) # prints None
# What we want in Python 3.5.2
print(await coro) # will print 123
print(await coro) # raises RuntimeError |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-12-16 23:53:22 | yselivanov | set | recipients:
+ yselivanov, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, vstinner, asvetlov, martin.panter |
2015-12-16 23:53:22 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1450310002.82.0.504877245218.issue25887@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-12-16 23:53:22 | yselivanov | link | issue25887 messages |
2015-12-16 23:53:22 | yselivanov | create | |
|