Message256470
I like the idea. I have one suggestion: can we add 'milliseconds' as an option too? And might a well add 'nanoseconds' too, for future-proofing. I suppose there isn't a real use case for 'hours' but it seems silly to leave it out. I expect that 'minutes' will be the most popular option, since HH:MM is the precision that most people care about for meetings and stuff. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-12-15 17:34:47 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, lemburg, tim.peters, skip.montanaro, terry.reedy, belopolsky, vstinner, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, cvrebert, berker.peksag, matrixise, elixir, jerry.elmore, acucci |
2015-12-15 17:34:46 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1450200886.95.0.0559835219753.issue19475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-12-15 17:34:46 | gvanrossum | link | issue19475 messages |
2015-12-15 17:34:46 | gvanrossum | create | |
|