Author jaraco
Recipients Daniel.Gonzalez, bhuvan, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ggenellina, jaraco, martin.panter, mdomingues, taleinat
Date 2015-12-02.21:10:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1449090604.88.0.873104349719.issue1927@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
+1 to applying this patch. After reviewing this and Issue 12869, I don't see any substantial objections or concerns. The status is "test needed". Is a test really needed? My instinct that simply aligning the implementation with the docs is sufficient.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-12-02 21:10:05jaracosetrecipients: + jaraco, ggenellina, taleinat, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, mdomingues, martin.panter, Daniel.Gonzalez, bhuvan
2015-12-02 21:10:04jaracosetmessageid: <1449090604.88.0.873104349719.issue1927@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-12-02 21:10:04jaracolinkissue1927 messages
2015-12-02 21:10:04jaracocreate