Message255220
> I think the above code *should* break
Actually, I see now that Serhiy's patch would allow this example to just pass through to the non-interactive fallback. So I take it back that my example should break--I think using the fallback would also be fine. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-11-23 20:25:16 | erik.bray | set | recipients:
+ erik.bray, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, vstinner, dangyogi, r.david.murray, gruszczy, flox, aliles, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
2015-11-23 20:25:16 | erik.bray | set | messageid: <1448310316.07.0.392547520526.issue8256@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-11-23 20:25:16 | erik.bray | link | issue8256 messages |
2015-11-23 20:25:16 | erik.bray | create | |
|