Author erik.bray
Recipients aliles, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, dangyogi, erik.bray, flox, gruszczy, martin.panter, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2015-11-23.20:25:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1448310316.07.0.392547520526.issue8256@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I think the above code *should* break

Actually, I see now that Serhiy's patch would allow this example to just pass through to the non-interactive fallback.  So I take it back that my example should break--I think using the fallback would also be fine.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-11-23 20:25:16erik.braysetrecipients: + erik.bray, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, vstinner, dangyogi, r.david.murray, gruszczy, flox, aliles, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2015-11-23 20:25:16erik.braysetmessageid: <1448310316.07.0.392547520526.issue8256@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-11-23 20:25:16erik.braylinkissue8256 messages
2015-11-23 20:25:16erik.braycreate