Message254120
+ (void)Py_BUILD_ASSERT_EXPR(INT_MAX <= _PyTime_MAX / SEC_TO_NS);
Hum, maybe the existing macro should be renamed to Py_BUILD_ASSERT_EXPR and a new Py_BUILD_ASSERT_EXPR macro should add the (void) to ignore the result? It would avoid to have to repeat (void) everywhere.
What do you think? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-11-05 16:53:35 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, serhiy.storchaka |
2015-11-05 16:53:35 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1446742415.92.0.519205819647.issue25558@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-11-05 16:53:35 | vstinner | link | issue25558 messages |
2015-11-05 16:53:35 | vstinner | create | |
|