Message252661
That's what I have now:
check:
$(PYTHON) -m py_compile $(SOURCES)
rm -f $(addsuffix c, $(SOURCES))
make check
python -m py_compile redacted-build redacted-git-diff redacted-git-gc redacted-git-status redacted-init redacted-server
redactedbuilder.py
rm -f redacted-buildc redacted-git-diffc redacted-git-gcc redacted-git-statusc redacted-initc redacted-serverc redactedb
uilder.pyc
That's what David is suggesting:
check:
for file in $(SOURCES); do \
python -c "compile(open('$$file').read(), '', 'exec')" || exit 1; \
done
make check
for file in redacted-build redacted-git-diff redacted-git-gc redacted-git-status redacted-init redacted-server redactedb
uilder.py; do \
python -c "compile(open('$file').read(), '', 'exec')" || exit 1; \
done
That's what I could have if I live long enough to see Python 3.6 on my development machine.
check:
$(PYTHON) -m py_compile --no-output $(SOURCES)
make check
python -m py_compile --no-output redacted-build redacted-git-diff redacted-git-gc redacted-git-status redacted-init redacted-server
redactedbuilder.py
If that does not seem like an important improvement, then I can live with what I have. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-10-09 21:15:04 | proski | set | recipients:
+ proski, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, eric.araujo, r.david.murray |
2015-10-09 21:15:04 | proski | set | messageid: <1444425304.87.0.251623763065.issue25303@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-10-09 21:15:04 | proski | link | issue25303 messages |
2015-10-09 21:15:04 | proski | create | |
|