Message248526
Somehow, you need to preserve access to the stack memory. The generated code is still growing the stack, it just fails to touch any of it.
I'm guessing a volatile access would just add an extra non-stack access to the infinite loop.
Initially, I had tried creating a non-inlined function to touch the stack memory. It worked in this case, but still required some undesirable compiler specific assistance. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-08-13 16:14:30 | Paul Murphy | set | recipients:
+ Paul Murphy, pitrou, vstinner |
2015-08-13 16:14:30 | Paul Murphy | set | messageid: <1439482470.39.0.153413208225.issue24851@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-08-13 16:14:30 | Paul Murphy | link | issue24851 messages |
2015-08-13 16:14:29 | Paul Murphy | create | |
|