Author introom
Recipients Chris Smowton, Ingo Ruhnke, berker.peksag, christian.heimes, doko, gnarvaja, introom, r.david.murray, rblank
Date 2015-08-12.15:05:26
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1439391926.81.0.167019075452.issue23906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Instead of setting a MAXSIZE for the email body, rasing up the MAXLINE might be more meaningful.


Consider the case of MAXSIZE, it's essentially the same as MAXLINE. If MAXSIZE is relatively small, some messages won't pass through. If the MAXSIZE is relatively large, then what's the meaning of setting it?


Thus, it might be more practical to increase the value of MAXLINE so that 99% messages can pass through.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-08-12 15:05:26introomsetrecipients: + introom, doko, rblank, christian.heimes, r.david.murray, berker.peksag, gnarvaja, Ingo Ruhnke, Chris Smowton
2015-08-12 15:05:26introomsetmessageid: <1439391926.81.0.167019075452.issue23906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-08-12 15:05:26introomlinkissue23906 messages
2015-08-12 15:05:26introomcreate