Author rbcollins
Recipients berker.peksag, chad.birch, cvrebert, demian.brecht, martin.panter, orsenthil, rbcollins, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2015-07-29.20:40:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1438202402.5.0.161722598997.issue20059@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
So, I think this is worth applying. The discussion around :ipp etc is irrelevant here: this patch changes large or negative ints to be a valueerror, as non-ints are.

The only question is where. I think this is in the category of 'will only break buggy applications' - applications that already handle ValueError to deal with bad inputs, will not be broken. Applications that depend on ports outside the valid range for ports will be broken, but thats the definition of the bug.

So I propose to apply to 2.7/3.4/3.5/3.6, but I'm going to seek a second opinion.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-07-29 20:40:02rbcollinssetrecipients: + rbcollins, orsenthil, cvrebert, berker.peksag, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, demian.brecht, chad.birch
2015-07-29 20:40:02rbcollinssetmessageid: <1438202402.5.0.161722598997.issue20059@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-07-29 20:40:02rbcollinslinkissue20059 messages
2015-07-29 20:40:01rbcollinscreate