This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients ezio.melotti, fgallaire, georg.brandl, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2015-07-21.01:13:26
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1437441208.44.0.704886085247.issue24665@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The problem is (if I'm understanding this correctly, which I may not be, I'm not a unicode expert) is that how you compute and manipulate CJK characters in python2 differs depending on whether you are dealing with a wide build or a narrow build.  And the fact that python3 doesn't handle it either is why this would be a new feature (see the referenced issues).

But I could be wrong.  I leave it to the unicode experts.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-07-21 01:13:28r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, georg.brandl, pitrou, vstinner, ezio.melotti, fgallaire, serhiy.storchaka
2015-07-21 01:13:28r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1437441208.44.0.704886085247.issue24665@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-07-21 01:13:28r.david.murraylinkissue24665 messages
2015-07-21 01:13:27r.david.murraycreate