Author gstarck
Recipients brett.cannon, gstarck, loewis, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, zuo
Date 2015-07-13.18:23:17
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1436811797.64.0.711642055595.issue10682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
>  unneeded consistency

"unneeded" consistency !:?

I'd say that either there is a "full or complete" consistency on the mentionned point/element of syntax, or there is none .. but an unneeded one.. or an half-one, isn't "consistent consistency" by then ;)
History
Date User Action Args
2015-07-13 18:23:17gstarcksetrecipients: + gstarck, loewis, brett.cannon, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, zuo
2015-07-13 18:23:17gstarcksetmessageid: <1436811797.64.0.711642055595.issue10682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-07-13 18:23:17gstarcklinkissue10682 messages
2015-07-13 18:23:17gstarckcreate