Message246696
> unneeded consistency
"unneeded" consistency !:?
I'd say that either there is a "full or complete" consistency on the mentionned point/element of syntax, or there is none .. but an unneeded one.. or an half-one, isn't "consistent consistency" by then ;) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-07-13 18:23:17 | gstarck | set | recipients:
+ gstarck, loewis, brett.cannon, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, zuo |
2015-07-13 18:23:17 | gstarck | set | messageid: <1436811797.64.0.711642055595.issue10682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-07-13 18:23:17 | gstarck | link | issue10682 messages |
2015-07-13 18:23:17 | gstarck | create | |
|