Message246109
Thanks for the legwork, Steven!
So far it looks like a gcc bug when using -m32 (whether ints, longs and/or pointers are 4 or 8 bytes _should_ make no difference to anything in Jason Swails's C example).
But it may be a red herring anyway: there's only one chance in 2**53 of getting a random.random() result equal to 1.-2.**-53 to begin with. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-07-03 00:37:21 | tim.peters | set | recipients:
+ tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, Serge Anuchin |
2015-07-03 00:37:20 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1435883840.94.0.761307744949.issue24546@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-07-03 00:37:20 | tim.peters | link | issue24546 messages |
2015-07-03 00:37:20 | tim.peters | create | |
|