This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients gvanrossum, martin.panter, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2015-06-24.08:35:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
While trying to port the example at <> to use “async def”, I discovered the ensure_future() function does not like the coroutine field name changes introduced in Issue 24400:

>>> asyncio.ensure_future(slow_operation(future))
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/proj/python/cpython/Lib/asyncio/", line 196, in __repr__
    info = self._repr_info()
  File "/home/proj/python/cpython/Lib/asyncio/", line 105, in _repr_info
    coro = coroutines._format_coroutine(self._coro)
  File "/home/proj/python/cpython/Lib/asyncio/", line 242, in _format_coroutine
    filename = coro.gi_code.co_filename
AttributeError: 'coroutine' object has no attribute 'gi_code'

I understand the gi_ names all changed to cr_, so I guess this code has to adjust as well.
Date User Action Args
2015-06-24 08:35:28martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, gvanrossum, vstinner, yselivanov
2015-06-24 08:35:28martin.pantersetmessageid: <>
2015-06-24 08:35:27martin.panterlinkissue24495 messages
2015-06-24 08:35:27martin.pantercreate