Message245534
That would not make it simpler. In fact it would make the test code more complex. I'd still need the safeSetUpClass dodge (or repeat the try/except/log in every setUpClass method), and I'd have to have a wrapper function that I passed each cleanup to as an argument to wrap it in a try/except/log, since close would just propagate the exceptions.
I think implementing this parallel to addCleanUp is much cleaner, even if the feature isn't (yet :) in the stdlib. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-06-19 22:51:12 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, taleinat, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, serhiy.storchaka |
2015-06-19 22:51:12 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1434754272.95.0.44139150654.issue24412@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-06-19 22:51:12 | r.david.murray | link | issue24412 messages |
2015-06-19 22:51:12 | r.david.murray | create | |
|