This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Lucretiel
Recipients Lucretiel, yselivanov
Date 2015-06-05.19:26:46
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAJgbSB6TZQX528SwGeDGm+oQYGuDHO7Khp_LLYdHJd_ji2xYBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1433532056.19.0.589560956529.issue23653@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Doesn't the same issue exist for all other uses of the idiom, though?
Python provides container "truthiness" even though `len(x) == 0` is more
"correct."

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, 3:20 PM Yury Selivanov <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Yury Selivanov added the comment:
>
> Nathan, consider the following signature:
>
>   def foo(a=0:''): pass
>
> now, sig.parameters['a'].annotation will be '' and .default will be 0, and
> they will fail 'if param.annotation or param.default' check.  That's why we
> encourage checks like 'if param.annotation is not param.empty'.
>
> Closing this issue.
>
> ----------
> assignee:  -> yselivanov
> nosy: +yselivanov
> resolution:  -> rejected
> status: open -> closed
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23653>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2015-06-05 19:26:47Lucretielsetrecipients: + Lucretiel, yselivanov
2015-06-05 19:26:47Lucretiellinkissue23653 messages
2015-06-05 19:26:46Lucretielcreate