Message244818
> Hmm, but IMHO a) the new syntax isn't just for asyncio and b) awaiting a Future seems like a *very* reasonable thing to do. I think opening a new ticket for this is a good idea.
Stefan, I honestly have bo idea what concurrent.Future.__await__ would do. There is no loop for concurrent module. If you have a patch with tests in mind, please open a separate issue (targeting 3.6). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-06-04 13:06:12 | yselivanov | set | recipients:
+ yselivanov, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, scoder, vstinner, asvetlov, alex.gronholm, python-dev |
2015-06-04 13:06:12 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1433423172.24.0.124792942599.issue24017@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-06-04 13:06:12 | yselivanov | link | issue24017 messages |
2015-06-04 13:06:12 | yselivanov | create | |
|