Message243886
I vary between +0 and -0 for the addition of the concrete method.
When I'm at +0, the main rationale is that we *don't* have the "Where do we stop?" risk here that itertools faces, as we're just replicating the synchronous builtins.
When I'm at -0, the main rationale is that a recipe works with *any* version of Python that provides concurrent.futures (including any version of the PyPI backport), and is hence useful immediately, while a method would only work the version where we added it. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-05-23 05:03:28 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, paul.moore, bquinlan, pitrou, jnoller, cool-RR, ethan.furman, sbt |
2015-05-23 05:03:28 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1432357408.03.0.22631375205.issue24195@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-05-23 05:03:28 | ncoghlan | link | issue24195 messages |
2015-05-23 05:03:27 | ncoghlan | create | |
|