Author ncoghlan
Recipients Arfrever, berker.peksag, elixir, inada.naoki, ishimoto, jwilk, loewis, martin.panter, mrabarnett, ncoghlan, nikratio, pitrou, rurpy2, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2015-05-16.14:42:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1431787339.44.0.396201303317.issue15216@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Revisiting the idea Nikolaus raised last year regarding whether or not this could be done using a dedicated API in the sys module, I realised today that even if we decided to use a separate public API, *that API* would still need a defined way to modify the stream encoding and error handling in place.

Since we're going to need the object level in-place modification API regardless, a separate sys module API for modifying the standard streams in particular would then introduce additional complexity without providing a proportional benefit.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-05-16 14:42:19ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, loewis, ishimoto, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, mrabarnett, Arfrever, inada.naoki, nikratio, rurpy2, berker.peksag, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, elixir
2015-05-16 14:42:19ncoghlansetmessageid: <1431787339.44.0.396201303317.issue15216@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-05-16 14:42:19ncoghlanlinkissue15216 messages
2015-05-16 14:42:19ncoghlancreate