Message 243276 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	bquinlan, cool-RR, ethan.furman, jnoller, paul.moore, pitrou, sbt
Date	2015-05-15.16:33:51
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1431707631.85.0.530721182178.issue24195@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
But to answer your argument: > I think this is sufficiently tricky to get right that it's worth > adding filter() as a parallel to the existing map() API. "Tricky to get right" is not a good criterion. The question is whether it's useful or not. Only the OP has had that need AFAIK.

But to answer your argument:

> I think this is sufficiently tricky to get right that it's worth
> adding filter() as a parallel to the existing map() API.

"Tricky to get right" is not a good criterion. The question is whether it's useful or not. Only the OP has had that need AFAIK.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-05-15 16:33:51	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, paul.moore, bquinlan, jnoller, cool-RR, ethan.furman, sbt
2015-05-15 16:33:51	pitrou	set	messageid: <1431707631.85.0.530721182178.issue24195@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-05-15 16:33:51	pitrou	link	issue24195 messages
2015-05-15 16:33:51	pitrou	create