This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author petr.viktorin
Recipients barry, ethan.furman, petr.viktorin, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah
Date 2015-05-13.19:02:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1431543742.72.0.776992420741.issue23699@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Is it really not better to give the operation a name, rather than repeating the same ten lines every time? (Well, not the same -- all the modules code it a bit differently, but with the same meaning.)

I might be true that the types in Python itself are "done", but this is intended as part of the C API. There are still modules unported to Python 3, for which *now* is the beginning.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-05-13 19:02:22petr.viktorinsetrecipients: + petr.viktorin, barry, rhettinger, skrah, ethan.furman, serhiy.storchaka
2015-05-13 19:02:22petr.viktorinsetmessageid: <1431543742.72.0.776992420741.issue23699@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-05-13 19:02:22petr.viktorinlinkissue23699 messages
2015-05-13 19:02:22petr.viktorincreate