Message242102
> Please either
> 1) drop the throw() method entirely or
> 2) make throw an abstractmethod()
Ok, as I already said, I think it's important to provide the complete protocol as code will usually expect that. Also, close() has a helpful implementation, but it depends on throw(). Thus, I'll go with 2) and make throw() abstract. It's easy enough to call super(), but then it's explicit. I agree that that's better here.
Patch updated. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-04-27 06:26:11 | scoder | set | recipients:
+ scoder, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, lukasz.langa, Ludovic.Gasc, martin.panter, yselivanov |
2015-04-27 06:26:11 | scoder | set | messageid: <1430115971.36.0.61758436321.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-04-27 06:26:11 | scoder | link | issue24018 messages |
2015-04-27 06:26:11 | scoder | create | |
|