➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients gvanrossum, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2015-04-21.05:26:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1429593962.56.0.604146287404.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I agree that there is no big reason why we should force generators to stop working after close(). Your new default implementation of close() is probably the right thing too. I added a few new comments on Reitveld.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-04-21 05:26:02martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, scoder, vstinner, lukasz.langa, yselivanov
2015-04-21 05:26:02martin.pantersetmessageid: <1429593962.56.0.604146287404.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-04-21 05:26:02martin.panterlinkissue24018 messages
2015-04-21 05:26:02martin.pantercreate