This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.snow
Recipients Claudiu.Popa, belopolsky, christian.heimes, eric.snow, ethan.furman, ionelmc, jedwards, llllllllll, r.david.murray, rhettinger, steven.daprano, terry.reedy
Date 2015-04-20.14:02:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Ionel Cristian Mărieș added the comment:
> Also, descriptors are a core mechanism in new-style classes - you can't
> have methods without descriptors. Why would you even consider removing
> descriptors from the special method lookup if that's part of the object
> model design?

Also, we are not changing anything here and we are not considering
removing descriptors from special method lookup.  This is the way it
has been for a long time for code that *checks* for special method
capability.  As RDM and I have both said, changing that would break
backward compatibility.  As I've already explained, I also think it is
Date User Action Args
2015-04-20 14:02:22eric.snowsetrecipients: + eric.snow, rhettinger, terry.reedy, belopolsky, christian.heimes, ionelmc, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, Claudiu.Popa, ethan.furman, llllllllll, jedwards
2015-04-20 14:02:22eric.snowlinkissue23990 messages
2015-04-20 14:02:22eric.snowcreate