Author martin.panter
Recipients akuchling, docs@python, martin.panter, nadeem.vawda, phr, terry.reedy
Date 2015-04-18.12:42:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1429360967.33.0.143186737624.issue5784@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Looks good in general (apart from one grammar comment).

It might be best to only include one copy, and reference the others. There are actually three places “wbits” is allowed that I can see:

* compressobj()
* decompress()
* decompressobj()

Maybe just pointing from decompress() and decompressobj() back to the compressobj() description would be good enough. Unless if you know if wbits=0 is also accepted or not for decompression.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-04-18 12:42:47martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, akuchling, terry.reedy, phr, nadeem.vawda, docs@python
2015-04-18 12:42:47martin.pantersetmessageid: <1429360967.33.0.143186737624.issue5784@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-04-18 12:42:47martin.panterlinkissue5784 messages
2015-04-18 12:42:47martin.pantercreate