This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author lemburg
Recipients Arfrever, barry, brett.cannon, doko, eric.snow, lemburg, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, python-dev, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2015-04-16.17:40:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On 16.04.2015 19:14, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote:
> However, for plain .so files that you have on your system (which will
> mostly like not support more than 2-4 different architecture configurations
> running at the same time), I don't currently see a need to make things
> more complicated than necessary.
> Perhaps you can point me to some use cases where the triple
> platform tag is really useful.

Antoine's ticket is the first in two decades to request being
able to install .so extension files side-by-side, so even if
times and platforms change, people don't seem to have a big
issues without this feature.

If you have a need, it's not really hard to build your extensions
for different architecture ABIs in different directories. We've
been doing this for years, just like everyone else.
Date User Action Args
2015-04-16 17:40:59lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, barry, brett.cannon, doko, ncoghlan, pitrou, tim.golden, ned.deily, Arfrever, python-dev, eric.snow, zach.ware, steve.dower
2015-04-16 17:40:58lemburglinkissue22980 messages
2015-04-16 17:40:58lemburgcreate