Message241239
I think the convert to str -> process as str -> convert back to bytes approach is a good one - it's the same one we use in urllib.parse.
In this case, since we explicit need to handle mixed encodings, I also agree with the idea of using surrogate escape to make it possible to tunnel arbitrary bytes through the process, and expose that as a new module level API for Python 3.5. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-04-16 17:10:14 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, barry, gward, terry.reedy, pitrou, durin42, r.david.murray, berker.peksag |
2015-04-16 17:10:14 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1429204214.67.0.369564116492.issue17445@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-04-16 17:10:14 | ncoghlan | link | issue17445 messages |
2015-04-16 17:10:14 | ncoghlan | create | |
|