This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author skip.montanaro
Recipients martin.panter, skip.montanaro, steven.daprano, ulaganathanm123@gmail.com, wiggin15, worr
Date 2015-04-15.14:29:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1429108199.25.0.517727641542.issue23949@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I like the idea of the "too many" and "not enough" messages being symmetric. If it's not too hard, I would prefer them to both identify the number of expected and received values. I don't have a recent checkout at hand though, so it's non-trivial for me to produce a patch. The best I can do easily is toss peanuts from the gallery.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-04-15 14:29:59skip.montanarosetrecipients: + skip.montanaro, steven.daprano, wiggin15, martin.panter, worr, ulaganathanm123@gmail.com
2015-04-15 14:29:59skip.montanarosetmessageid: <1429108199.25.0.517727641542.issue23949@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-04-15 14:29:59skip.montanarolinkissue23949 messages
2015-04-15 14:29:59skip.montanarocreate