➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients larry, loewis, pitrou, r.david.murray, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2015-04-09.22:10:51
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1428617451.84.0.478374799534.issue19738@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Perhaps we need a time_ns() method? (returning an integer timestamp in nanoseconds)

Oh, I missed this message. The current trend in Python (os.stat) is to use a number of nanoseconds to store a timestamp. If we continue this trend in the datetime module, maybe with a new total_nanoseconds() method for example, it may make sense to add a new time.time_ns() function.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-04-09 22:10:51vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, loewis, pitrou, larry, r.david.murray
2015-04-09 22:10:51vstinnersetmessageid: <1428617451.84.0.478374799534.issue19738@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-04-09 22:10:51vstinnerlinkissue19738 messages
2015-04-09 22:10:51vstinnercreate